Corpun file 20581
Hansard (House of Commons), London, 17 November 1966
Written Answers (Commons) Home Department
Maxwell (Birching Award)
46. Mr. Biggs-Davison
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department on
what date he was informed by the visiting magistrates of the
birching sentence on Roger Keith Maxwell; and on what date he
made known his decision that the punishment should not be carried
out.
Mr. Roy Jenkins
I would refer the hon. Member to the Answer I gave on 19th
October to a Question by the hon. Member for Maidstone (Mr. John
Wells). [Vol. 734, c.55.]
Mr. Boyd-Carpenter
asked the Secretary of State for the Home Department why he
refused to confirm the sentence of birching recommended by the
visiting magistrates in the case of Roger Maxwell in respect of
his assault on a prison officer; what alternative penalty he has
imposed; what is his policy in respect of such recommended
punishments; and what communications he has received about his
decision from the representatives of prison officers.
Mr. Roy Jenkins
Each case is considered on its merits. In Maxwell's case
it was clear that on medical grounds, independent of any other
considerations, I should not have been justified in confirming
this award. Maxwell has already been kept in conditions of
solitary confinement, except for the two sessions a week when he
undergoes psychiatric treatment, for 79 days, and this will be
continued as long as is thought necessary.
I have discussed the case fully with
representatives of the Prison Officers' Association.
HC Deb 17 November 1966 vol 736 cc151-2W
|