Corpun file 22658
The Queanbeyan Age, New South Wales, 30 September 1886, p.2
Birching Juvenile Offenders
Click to enlarge |
The operation of birching -- in other words, the whipping of
offenders against decency under 21 years of age -- which took
place at Pentridge on Wednesday, is (the Argus states) a
punishment that, although familiar to the law, has been almost
unknown in practice in Victoria.
Only two delinquents have undergone this punishment, and both
of them were convicted at Ballarat. In each case the birch,
instead of the "cat," was used, because the culprits
were under 21 years of age, but the birch is not alluded to in
any Act of Parliament. It is an invention for the cure of the
worst larrikins, for which the governor of the Pentridge penal
establishment takes all the credit, and he is proud of its
efficacy in carrying out the sentence of the Court when it orders
that an offender shall be "privately whipped" on the
lower part of the back during the currency of his term of
imprisonment. The higher courts are empowered to inflict flogging
for robbery under arms and offences against decency of two kinds,
while justices of the peace are only authorised by the clause in
question to order the corporal chastisement of one class of
offenders who may be summarily convicted. The youth birched on
Wednesday was Alexander Fraser, a labourer, aged 19, who was
sentenced by the chairman of petty sessions, Ballarat East, to
receive 25 strokes in addition to three months' imprisonment,
which commenced on the 19th ult. He was sent to Pentridge because
the Ballarat Jail has no triangles or whipping-post, and also in
order that the common hangman, who acts as flagellator, might
avoid a journey to Ballarat.
| |
About this website
Search this site
Country files: Judicial CP in Australia
Archive up to 1975: Australia
Picture index
|